Ovid (publius_ovidius) wrote,
Ovid
publius_ovidius

Perl Testing Stuff

If you're not a Perl geek into testing, this won't make sense to you. I've posted this here for them to see since I can control the formatting here.

Here's the output from the latest version of my TAPx::Parser software, a testing tool designed to replace Test::Harness and the prove utility bundled with it.

work $ runtests -lcq
t/00-load..................ok     
t/cp_demo_lib..............ok   
t/cp_lib...................ok     
t/db_connection............ok   
t/dh_password..............ok   
t/dh_server................Failed 1/61 tests
t/domain_lib...............ok     
t/datacentre_install.......ok     
t/install_sql..............ok     
t/general_lib..............ok     
t/order_lib................ok       
t/platform_utils...........ok   
t/pod-coverage.............ok     
t/pod......................ok     
t/reset_vars...............ok     
t/rpc_action...............ok   
t/rpc_dedserver............ok     
t/server_stock_manager.....ok     
t/sql_stripper.............ok     
t/template_tree_process....ok     
t/test_class_tests.........Failed 2/186 tests
        (less 1 skipped test: 183 okay)

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/dh_server.t                 (Wstat: 256 Tests: 61 Failed: 1)
  Failed tests:  52
t/pod-coverage.t              (Wstat: 0 Tests: 42 Failed: 0)
  Tests skipped: 3, 8, 34, 37
t/test_class_tests.t          (Wstat: 512 Tests: 186 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  2, 5
  Tests skipped: 3
Files=21, Tests=859, 32 wallclock secs (12.82 cusr +  2.90 csys = 15.72 CPU)
Tags: perl, programming, technology
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 7 comments